THE TRUTH:
"Liberals *Democrats* love to divide us by economic class, and discuss
policies in terms of which class will benefit or suffer by their
passage. The problem is that class is a moving target. What are the
magical income levels that define poor, middle, and rich? Further,
Democrats assume that no one has the ability to rise above the
economic situation into which they were born. People climb up
the income ladder everyday when they work at it." ---Herman Cain
"A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government.
It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote
themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment
on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the
most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a
democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, followed
always by a dictatorship. The average age of the world's greatest
civilizations has been 200 years." ---Alexander Fraser Tytler
AGAIN: "We are NOT a DEMOCRACY!
We are a CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC!
IMPORTANT FACTS:
"The latest jobless rate ---4.7 percent--- is at a five-year
low. Yet, despite this and other good economic news, the Democrats
are frantic to repeal the Bush administration's tax cuts. In fact,
even if every single economic indicator were better than at any
time in American history, the Democrats would still want to repeal
the tax cuts. The reason is that the essence of the Left is ever
bigger government for the purpose of controlling ever more of
the economic and social life of society. That America is so much
more economically efficient than the major socialist countries of
Europe, such as France and Germany, is of no concern to Democrats
and others on the Left... These [L]iberals want high taxes not in
order to improve the economy, but in order to expand government
and reduce economic inequality. Therefore, the obvious economic
benefits of lower taxes do not much interest liberals... One
wonders if ever before in history such a large number of people
had such a clear view of the consequences of their policies,
and despite the failure of those policies, continued to devote
their lives to enacting them. And the Left thinks religious
Americans are irrational. That is why the language of liberal
condemnation of tax cuts is that they are 'tax cuts for the
rich' rather than that they are 'bad for the economy.' It is
resentment of the wealthier---and most productive---sector
of America that animates liberal opposition to tax cuts, not
concern about unemployment... [T]hose on the left need to cheer
the unemployment data. But they can't do that until they love
the low unemployment figures even more than they hate George Bush
and his tax cuts." ---Dennis Prager
"The 15 percent tax rate for individual capital gains has
been a stunning policy success since it went into action in
2003, so why is the corporate capital-gains tax rate still a
whopping 35 percent? The empirically proven arguments for low
capital-gains tax rates apply at least as well for corporations
as they do for individuals; it is time to slash the corporate
cap-gains tax rate... Cutting the cap-gains tax is the ultimate
supply-side win-win. While the corporate cap-gains tax is
idling, the individual cap-gains tax is headed in the wrong
direction---under current law a hike is scheduled to occur
in less than three years. Both of these situations amount to
public-policy malpractice. Congress should act immediately to
establish a permanent 15 percent cap-gains tax rate for both
individuals and corporations, a win-win policy that will promote
economic growth and prosperity while at the same increasing
federal revenue." ---Phil Kerpen
FOUNDING HISTORY:
"The moment the idea is admitted into society that property is
not as sacred as the laws of God, and that there is not a force
of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny
commence. If 'Thou shalt not covet' and 'Thou shalt not steal'
were not commandments of Heaven, they must be made inviolable
precepts in every society before it can be civilized or made
free." ---John Adams
"Throughout most of American history, taxes were levied principally
on consumption, rather than income... In the Federalist Papers,
Alexander Hamilton had this to say, 'It is a single advantage of
taxes on articles of consumption that they contain in their own
nature a security against excess... If duties are too high, they
lessen the consumption; the collection is eluded; and the product
to the Treasury is not so great as when they are confined within
proper and moderate bounds.' Hamilton was thinking here about
direct taxes on consumption, such as the sales taxes levied by
most state governments. He was right in thinking that there is a
limit to such taxes. Experience shows that general sales tax rates
much above 10 percent are very hard to collect. They encourage
smuggling, black markets, evasion, production for personal use,
substitution for untaxed commodities
|
and other activities that
erode the tax base." ---Bruce Bartlett
"The collection of taxes which are not absolutely required, which
do not beyond reasonable doubt contribute to the public welfare,
is only a species of legalized larceny. The wise and correct course
to follow in taxation is not to destroy those who have already
secured success, but to create conditions under which everyone
will have a better chance to be successful." ---Calvin Coolidge
AND FROM THE DESIGNER OF REAGANOMICS:
*John F. Kennedy addressing the Economic Club of New York, 14 December 1962*:
"I know you share my conviction that proud as we are of its
progress, this nation's economy can and must do even better than
it has done in the last five years. Our choice, therefore, boils
down to one of doing nothing and thereby risking a widening gap
between our actual and potential growth... or taking action at
the federal level to raise our entire economy to a new and higher
level of business activity...
The most direct and significant kind of federal action aiding
economic growth is to make possible an increase in private
consumption and investment demand---to cut the fetters which
hold back private spending. In the past, this could be done... by
increasing federal expenditures more rapidly than necessary---but
such a course would soon demoralize both the government and our
economy. If government is to retain the confidence of the people,
it must not spend more than can be justified on grounds of national
need or spent with maximum efficiency, and I shall say more on
this in a moment.
The final and best means of strengthening demand among consumers
and business is to reduce the burden on private income and the
deterrents to private initiative which are imposed by our present
tax system---and this administration pledged itself last summer to
an across-the-board, top to bottom cut in personal and corporate
income taxes...
I am not talking about a 'quickie' or temporary tax cut. Nor
am I talking about giving the economy a mere shot in the
arm, to ease some temporary complaint. I am talking about the
accumulated evidence of the last five years that our present tax
system... exerts too heavy a drag on growth in peacetime---that it
siphons out of the private economy too large a share of personal
and business purchasing power---that it reduces the financial
incentives for personal effort, investment and risk taking.
[We should reduce taxes] by a sufficiently early date and a
sufficiently large amount to do the job required. Early action
could give us extra leverage, added results and important insurance
against recession. Too large a tax cut, of course, could result
in inflation and insufficient future revenues---but the greater
danger is a tax cut too little or too late to be effective.
I do not underestimate the obstacles which the Congress will face
in enacting such legislation. No one will be satisfied. Everyone
will have his own approach, his own bill, his own reductions. A
high order of restraint and determination will be required if
the possible is not to wait on the perfect.
This nation can afford to reduce taxes... but we cannot afford
to do nothing. For on the strength of our free economy rests the
hope of all free nations."
MORE RECIENT:
"Extreme taxation, excessive controls, oppressive government
competition with business...frustrated minorities and forgotten
Americans are not the products of free enterprise. They are
the residue of centralized bureaucracy, of government by a
self-anointed elite." ---Ronald Reagan
THE LAST WORD:
"I don't mind paying taxes for a civilized society. It's paying
for the uncivilized part that grates on me. And I'm happy for the
existence of our government, but, goodness, why does its existence
have to be so big? Here is a telling quotation from Frederick
the Great, an 18th-century Prussian king: 'No government can
exist without taxation. This money must necessarily be levied
on the people; and the grand art consists of levying so as
not to oppress.' Yes, Freddy, levying without oppressing is a
grand art---much the way it is an art for a loan shark, while
collecting interest, to break all five fingers without harming
the wrist... Our tax code is the hardest thing in the world to
understand. It was made that way because our representatives,
seeking favor and dough, slipped in gobs of loopholes for their
buddies. Our government calls this 'tax reform,' and it is the
reason our tax code now runs, according to the Cato Institute,
61,000 pages in length and takes the average American nearly 30
hours to comply with." ---Tom Purcell
|